Social and Relationship Challenges in Autism - and why 'seek therapy' is not an appropriate response

- Guest author
Last update 09 Jun 2025
Reading time 6 mins

⚠️ Editor’s Note / Disclaimer While I am not a medical expert, this summary has been compiled to the best of my ability to clarify a common misconception. Although I aim for accuracy, there may be errors.

Autistic adults consistently report smaller social networks, higher loneliness, and lower satisfaction in friendships and romantic relationships than non-autistic adults. For example, Chan et al. (2023) note that adults across the spectrum have poorer social relationships than neurotypical peers, and only about 60% of autistic adults report having a close friend (which correlates with reduced loneliness).Loneliness in autism is strongly linked to anxiety and depression: Mazurek (2014) found that greater friendship quantity and quality were associated with decreased loneliness and better emotional well-being (higher self-esteem, lower depression/anxiety). Conversely, many autistic adults report feeling isolated; in clinical surveys more than half indicate an absence of close social ties. Autistic individuals often want friendships and romantic connections, but they frequently encounter barriers to forming or sustaining them. Overall, empirical studies show autistic adults face real challenges in developing and maintaining satisfying relationships, with smaller networks and higher loneliness than typical peers.

Cognitive and Sensory Demands of Socializing

Social interaction can be cognitively and emotionally taxing for autistic people. Qualitative studies describe socializing as a “social battery” - a finite resource that is easily depleted by the effort of conversation, non-verbal cues, and masking behaviors. Walsh et al. (2025) report that autistic young adults find typical social conventions “cognitively demanding, emotionally exhausting, and sometimes leading to feelings of inauthenticity”. Autistic participants liken “people-ing” to running a marathon: the constant monitoring of eye contact, tone, and hidden rules requires thinking “ten times more than anyone else” and quickly causes burnout. Sensory overload in noisy or chaotic environments further compounds this stress. In practice, many autistic adults cope by planning activities that involve less face-to-face interaction (e.g. online chats, attending events where social norms are reduced) or by taking extended breaks afterwards. When environments are unaccommodating (too bright, too loud, unpredictable), these demands spike and exhaustion intensifies. In short, the neurocognitive load of socializing is higher for autistic people, meaning they may need more space, predictability, and acceptance to engage comfortably.

Medical vs. Neurodiversity Models: Why “Seek Therapy” Falls Short

Telling an autistic person to simply “seek therapy” for social needs reflects a medical model assumption that the individual is deficient and must be fixed. In contrast, the neurodiversity perspective argues that autism is a form of diversity, not a pathology. Chan et al. emphasize that a neurodiversity framework “challenges the use of normative outcomes as the benchmark for success” in social participation.Under this view, autistic differences in social behavior are strengths or variations, not inherent deficits. Social and environmental barriers (stigma, inaccessible social spaces, lack of autism-aware peers) magnify the impact of those differences. Therefore, advising an autistic person to “seek therapy” without addressing context is ineffective at best. It ignores evidence that social support and community inclusion - not just individual intervention - are critical for well-being. Indeed, Valderrama et al. (2023) note that “social support is a protective factor in the mental health of autistic people”.In practice, many therapists lack autism-specific knowledge, so therapy is often experienced as misunderstanding or worse. Thus, the reflexive “seek therapy” response is widely viewed by autistic self-advocates as dismissive and even harmful, because it glosses over systemic factors and implies something is “wrong” with the person.

Evidence-Based Support and Inclusion Strategies

Research highlights alternative approaches that respect autistic social needs:

By contrast with a one-size-fits-all “therapy” mandate, these evidence-based practices recognize the social needs of autistic adults on their own terms. They work by modifying the environment and supports rather than “curing” the individual.

Conclusion

In sum, telling autistic adults to “seek therapy” for wanting friendships or relationships ignores the scientific evidence. Autistic people frequently face genuine loneliness and relationship barriers.Their social struggles often stem from mismatches between neurodiverse brains and a neurotypical world - not from a lack of will. A neurodiversity-informed approach would advocate for acceptance, accommodation, and community-building, rather than pathologizing advice. As research shows, peer support and inclusive social opportunities effectively reduce isolation and improve well-being. Ultimately, responding to an autistic person’s social needs requires empathy and systemic solutions, not dismissive cliches.

References


Data protection policy

Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Spielauer, Wien (webcomplains389t48957@tspi.at)

This webpage is also available via TOR at http://rh6v563nt2dnxd5h2vhhqkudmyvjaevgiv77c62xflas52d5omtkxuid.onion/

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict Powered by FreeBSD IPv6 support